Skip to content
DenseChip
Learn
PracticeCode labInterview

DenseChip

Navigate

Menu

LearnPracticeCode labInterview

Tools

All toolsSV editorCode repoResume
DenseChip

Practice, courses, and chip-design tools in one focused workspace.

LearnPracticeCode labInterviewToolsLearning paths

© 2026 DenseChip

AboutRoadmapCareersInternshipsFAQContactPrivacyTerms
Skip to lesson

Course contents

  • Start Here5
  • SystemVerilog Language Foundations28
  • Object-Oriented SystemVerilog for Verification30
  • Constraint Randomization — Interview-Critical Deep Dive39
  • SystemVerilog Assertions — Interview-Critical Deep Dive41
  • Functional Coverage in SystemVerilog25
    • Covergroups & Coverpoints
    • Bins: Explicit, Auto, Illegal & Ignore
    • Cross Coverage
    • Coverage Options & Methods
      • option.per_instance & Instance Options
      • Weights, Goals & at_least
      • get_coverage(), sample() & Friends
      • Parameterizing Covergroups
    • Coverage Closure & Sign-Off
  • Testbench Architecture in SystemVerilog24
  • Advanced Language & Integration26
  • Senior & Interview Preparation23
  • Principal-Level Verification34
Loading lesson

←Functional Coverage in SystemVerilog
  1. Topics
  2. SystemVerilog
  3. Functional Coverage in SystemVerilog
  4. Coverage Options & Methods

Part 5 of 9Part 5 of 9/Functional CoverageIntermediate

Coverage Options & Methods

How per-instance options, weights, goals, sampling methods, and covergroup arguments shape coverage.

  • 4topics
  • 4lessons

Declaring bins says what to measure. Options, methods, and constructor arguments say how: which instances report separately, how much each part counts, when sampling runs, and how one definition serves many instances.

Knob

Question it answers

option.per_instance and option.name

Do N instances merge into one number or report as N rows, and what labels those rows?

option.weight, option.goal, option.at_least

How much does each element count, what is the target, and how many hits make a bin trustworthy?

sample, get_coverage, stop and start

How does a test trigger, read, and pause coverage at runtime?

Constructor arguments

How does one covergroup definition serve instances with different ranges and names?

Lesson

Path

What it covers

Instance options

Optional

Type-level versus per-instance accumulation, instance naming, and when separate rows matter.

Weights and goals

Recommended

Rollup weighting, done thresholds, hit thresholds, and instance scope versus type scope.

Sampling and query methods

Optional

Procedural sampling, coverage queries, gating windows, and tests that stop on goal.

Covergroup arguments

Optional

Constructor arguments, value versus ref passing, and one definition reused per port.

Required is the core first pass. Recommended is for most learners. Optional is reference, a specialist topic or revision.

Check yourself Four identical ports share one covergroup and the type-level number reads 98%. Why might one port still be broken?

The type-level number blends all instances. 98% here is the union of their bins (type_option.merge_instances = 1): three healthy ports hit nearly every bin, and an idle fourth port changes nothing. Per-instance rows make each port visible.

“Four ports report 98% — are you done?” is the classic opener for this topic. The expected answer names the merge trap, the per-instance fix, and the runtime check across instances.

PreviousNext: option.per_instance & Instance Options

Up next

Up nextoption.per_instance & Instance Options

Sign in to save progress

Practice this lessonPrevious lessonReport an error

See also

  • Covergroups & Coverpoints
  • Bins: Explicit, Auto, Illegal & Ignore
  • Cross Coverage